Asian J Kinesiol > Volume 24(3); 2022 > Article |
|
Funding
This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF-2019S1A5B5A07093627)
Variable |
Stage of change |
F | ƞ2 | Post hoc | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PC | CO | PR | AC | MA | |||||
1 | M | 9.0 | 11.7 | 12.5 | 13.2 | 14.6 | 34.2** | .30 | PC<CO,PR<MA; |
SD | 4.2 | 4.2 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 2.4 | PC<AC | |||
2 | M | 7.6 | 9.7 | 10.6 | 9.9 | 10.1 | 19.1** | .19 | PC<CO,PR,AC,MA |
SD | 2.7 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.8 | ||||
3 | M | 6.0 | 5.4 | 4.7 | 5.3 | 4.4 | 11.2** | .12 | PC>PR,MA; |
SD | 2.2 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.4 | MA<CO,AC | |||
4 | M | 41.4 | 53.9 | 56.9 | 53.4 | 52.2 | 15.0** | .16 | PC<CO,PR,AC,MA |
SD | 11.2 | 10.7 | 10.1 | 12.3 | 10.5 | ||||
5 | M | 8.4 | 9.6 | 10.9 | 9.8 | 9.0 | 12.1** | .13 | PC<CO,PR,AC,MA |
SD | 3.0 | 2.8 | 2.2 | 3.0 | 3.1 | ||||
6 | M | 8.4 | 9.6 | 10.9 | 9.8 | 9.9 | 2.9* | .04 | PC<PR |
SD | 3.8 | 3.4 | 3.1 | 3.5 | 3.2 | ||||
7 | M | 7.4 | 10.3 | 10.3 | 9.4 | 9.0 | 6.6** | .08 | PC<CO,PR,AC,MA |
SD | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 3.0 | ||||
8 | M | 9.0 | 12.9 | 13.6 | 12.6 | 13.2 | 30.4** | .28 | PC<CO,PR,AC,MA |
SD | 3.3 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 3.2 | 2.4 | ||||
9 | M | 8.4 | 9.7 | 10.0 | 10.1 | 10.2 | 6.5* | .08 | PC<AC,MA |
SD | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.9 | 2.4 | 2.7 | ||||
10 | M | 36.1 | 44.7 | 49.6 | 55.5 | 57.7 | 52.9** | .40 | PC<CO<AC,MA; |
SD | 10.3 | 10.3 | 10.9 | 9.9 | 9.7 | PC<PR,MA | |||
11 | M | 7.5 | 9.4 | 10.7 | 11.3 | 11.3 | 23.9** | .23 | PC<CO,PR,AC,MA; |
SD | 2.7 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 2.9 | CO<AC,MA | |||
12 | M | 7.3 | 8.5 | 9.8 | 11.7 | 12.8 | 61.8** | .45 | PC<PR<AC,MA; |
SD | 2.7 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.5 | CO<AC,MA | |||
13 | M | 6.5 | 7.4 | 8.8 | 9.1 | 9.4 | 11.6** | .13 | PC<PR,AC,MA; |
SD | 2.4 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 3.3 | 3.3 | CO<MA | |||
14 | M | 8.9 | 11.5 | 12.1 | 13.8 | 13.3 | 35.0** | .31 | PC<CO,PR,AC,MA; |
SD | 3.0 | 2.4 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 2.6 | CO<AC,MA | |||
15 | M | 6.0 | 8.0 | 8.4 | 9.8 | 10.0 | 29.2** | .27 | PC<CO,PR,CO,MA; |
SD | 2.2 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.4 | 2.8 | CO<AC,MA |
1=self-efficacy, 2=pros, 3=cons, 4=cognitive processes, 5=conscious raising, 6=dramatic relief, 7=environmental reevaluation, 8=self-reevaluation, 9=social liberation, 10=behavioral processes, 11=contingency management, 12=counter conditioning, 13=helping relationships, 14=self liberation, 15=stimulus control
PC=precontemplation, CO=contemplation, PR=preparation, AC=action, MA=maintenance
Variables | Self-efficacy | Pros | Cons | Cognitive processes | Behavioral processes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Self-efficacy | |||||
Pros | .42 | ||||
Cons | -.35 | -.24 | |||
Cognitive processes | .34 | .52 | -.17 | ||
Behavioral processes | .61 | .48 | -.29 | .67 |
Predictor variables |
Structure coefficients |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Function 1 | Function 2 | Function 3 | Function 4 | |
Counter conditioning | .82* | -.09 | .01 | -.01 |
Self-efficacy | .61* | .14 | -.22 | -.19 |
Self-liberation | .59* | .30 | .32 | -.07 |
Stimulus control | .56* | .14 | .07 | -.18 |
Contingency management | .49* | .24 | .10 | .23 |
Helping relationships | .35* | .09 | .0 | .27 |
Social liberation | .25* | .19 | -.04 | -.03 |
Self-reevaluation | .48 | .56* | -.29 | -.01 |
Consciousness raising | .25 | .49* | .03 | .20 |
Environmental reevaluation | .12 | .45* | -.04 | -.03 |
Pros | .39 | .42* | -.17 | .26 |
Cons | -.32 | -.07 | .43* | -.18 |
Dramatic relief | .03 | .29 | .09 | .47* |
Canonical R | .73 | .50 | .31 | .17 |
Eigenvalue | 1.15 | .34 | .10 | .03 |