A Biomechanical Analysis of the Effect of Pilates Exercise on Female College Students with Knee Joint Deformity

Article information

Asian J Kinesiol. 2021;23(3):20-28
Publication date (electronic) : 2021 July 31
doi : https://doi.org/10.15758/ajk.2021.23.3.20
1Division of Sport Science, Pusan National University, Republic of Korea
David Michael O’Sullivan, Division of Sport Science, Pusan National University, 2 Busandaehak-ro 63beon-gil, Geumjeong-gu, Busan, Rep. of Korea; Tel: +82-10-3285- 1626; E-mail: davidosullivan@pusan.ac.kr
Jung-Jun Park, Division of Sport Science, Pusan National University, 2 Busandaehakro 63beon-gil, Geumjeong-gu, Busan, Rep. of Korea; Tel: +82-10-7684-5811; E-mail: jjparkpnu@pusan.ac.kr
Received 2021 March 23; Accepted 2021 June 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current research on genu varum shows the favorable influence of exercise on the biomechanics of the knee joint by reducing the static malalignment and mechanical imbalances, however the transference to a more optimum gait has not been investigated.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of Pilates exercise on the changes of gait and lower limb malalignment in female students with genu varum.

METHODS

A total of 23 female college students with verified genu varum participated in this study. The participants were randomly assigned to two groups a Pilates exercise group (n=15) and a control group (n=8). The Pilates exercise group participated in 1 hour Pilates exercise 3 times per week for a total of 10 weeks. Each of the participants had an X-ray and performed gait 5 times before and after the exercise treatment. The participants kinetic and kinematic data were gathered using an eight Vicon Motion camera system and two force platforms.

RESULTS

For the Pilates group gait their maximum extension and internal rotation knee moment, and maximum adduction and internal rotation hip moment significantly increased, while the maximum knee moment flexion decreased. For the control group gait their maximum hip extension and hip adduction moment significantly decreased. For the Pilates group there was a significant reduction in the distance from the anatomical axis to the weight bearing line in the left leg, but there was no significant change for the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that Pilates exercise may be beneficial for females with genu varum by helping to improve both their static alignment and helping their gait to become more balanced.

Introduction

Genu varum of the knee joint causes gait impairment, which then induces structural and dysfunction of the joint [1-5]. The lower limb misalignment means that loads are unevenly distributed either medially or laterally, which causes movement disorders, osteoarthritis, muscle imbalances and weakness [6] and clinical symptoms of varus and valgus can be demonstrated to negatively affect the quality of life due to physical impairments [7,8].

Varus malalignment affects the ability of a person to walk for extended times due to fatigue, and as time passes, the weight of the knee joint is concentrated unevenly, shortening the life span of the joint [9,10]. These symptoms are exacerbated while walking up or down stairs because the compression force on the knee reaches 1-2 times body weight [11] and 3-4 times body weight during running [12]. Similarly, the more the axis of the lower limb is transferred to the medial side, there is a corresponding increase in the medial loading, which is shown to be a high risk of knee osteoarthritis [5,13,14]. Therefore the management of varus knee malalignment is essential for preventing abnormal gait and reducing the probability of early onset osteoarthritis.

Gait analysis has been demonstrated to be as useful tool for the study of lower limb dysfunction, highlighting the drastic effect misalignment has on pathology of adjacent joints [1,2,5,13]. However, the majority of the studies that focus on gait and varus are mainly aimed at evaluating surgical treatment results. Additionally, these studies mainly focus on elderly patients who have already developed osteoarthritis. Whereas in this study, we plan to focus on asymptomatic females who are in their early twenties and to examine their gait to evaluate the effectiveness of exercise treatment for varus due to leg misalignment.

Today, the treatment of genu varum includes the use of a knee joint orthosis, gait pattern correction due to intentional external rotation of the foot, fascia manual therapy, and orthotics, however it is difficult to maintain lasting effects with only orthodontic treatments. Corrective exercise therapy, i.e. Pilates, to prevent and treat lower limb misalignment include a variety of mechanisms, such as stretching and strengthening to increase the varus angle of the knee joint and reduce the adductor moment of the knee joint while walking, reducing the external rotation angle of the foot, and reducing the load on the inner side of the knee joint [15]. Continuous muscle strengthening exercise is well known as an intervention for the prevention and treatment of several chronic diseases, including musculoskeletal disorders [16]. In particular, stretching, which has a positive effect on the joint load of the knee joint, helps rehabilitation of the musculoskeletal system [17-23] and elastic band exercises with Therabands, and strength exercises on unstable surfaces, i.e. a bosu, can be used to activate stabilizer muscles and help the stability of the joint [24]. As such, most of the preceding studies, especially those using Pilates showed effective improvement in static joint function by improving the knee joint spacing and hip joint motion range, which are varus knee variables due to the improvement of lower extremity muscle strength, but research on how it affects dynamic joint function during walking is insufficient.

Posture malalignment is increasing due to extended sitting periods, the use of smart phones and a general lack of physical activity [25] and this reduces core stability which leads to postural misalignments, such as genu varum [26,27]. Pilates exercise programs are well known to help increase core stability and improve posture [28,29], by an improvement in stabilization of the lumbo-pelvic region [30,19] and similarly, it is shown to improve vertebral stability [31,32]. Pilates exercise is supposed to be effective in maintaining correct posture and body balance by promoting the practitioner to recognize their body alignment and the use of muscles in their optimum lengths [33,34,35]. Ten weeks of Pilates exercise is illustrated to be effective in improving spinal alignment in the sagittal plane of 34 healthy adults [36] and 12 weeks of training improved Thoracic kyphosis in healthy adults [37]. Additionally, after 7 weeks of Pilates it was reported that dancers knee flexion and extension increased, and pelvic alignment improved [38]. As there is no known research showing the effect of Pilates on genu varum but on the trunk posture only, we were interested to examine the effect of a Pilates exercise program on genu varum of female adults not only from X-ray data, but also from a dynamic gait analysis including kinetic and kinematic data. We hypothesize that improving the trunk posture and stability will help correct genu varum alignment.

Methods

Participants

Female participants aged between 20-24 years, who had an x-ray verified genu varum diagnosis were recruited for this study, after obtaining approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Pusan National University. To participate each participant had to sign an IRB approved consent form after a verbal explanation and reading of the consent form. A total of 30 participants were recruited and randomly assigned to two groups a Pilates exercise training (PIL, n=15) and a control group (CON, n=15). Among the control group 7 dropped out due to various reasons, which left only 8 to be included in the study. The inclusion criteria were that the participants had to be females aged 20 to 24, with verified genu varum (≥10 mm [10]) and no regular participation in physical activity. Any participants overweight with a BMI greater than 25 and any other orthopedic issues were excluded. <Table 1> shows the participants demographics.

Participants demographics

Testing procedure

Radiologic Genu Varum Evaluation

To measure and verify the genu varum the participants had their lower body x-rayed as shown in <Figure 1>. Each of the participants were instructed to stand in anatomical position, however, with their hands across their chest. The weightbearing line was drawn from the center of the hip joint to the center ankle joint. The anatomical axis was drawn from the center of the hip joint to the center of the knee joint. The distance from the center of the knee joint to the point on the weight-bearing line that crosses the knee joint was used to diagnose the genu varum <Figure 1>.

Figure 1.

Full length weight bearing anterior radiograph measurement A: anatomical axis, B: weight bearing line, | ab |= distance from anatomical axis to weight bearing line.

Equipment

Motion Capture

The participants’ kinematics were recorded using 6 infrared cameras (Vicon MX-T10, Oxford Metrics Ltd, Oxford, UK), and their kinetics were recorded using 2 force platforms (4060A, Bertec). For an accurate motion capture of the participants’ landmarks, the participants were instructed to change into tightly fitting sports top and shorts. For convenience of data collection 16 reflective markers (14mm in diameter) were placed on landmarks on the pelvis, thighs, shank and feet according to the Vicon standard Plug-in-gait marker set). Each of the participants had their gait recorded while they were barefooted to reduce any effects that the shoes could have on the kinetic and kinematics. The participation was requested to walk along the 8m pathway as naturally as possible while looking ahead. During the walking they were asked to try to step on the first force platform with their left foot and their right on the second force platform. Only after this familiarization period and the participant felt comfortable were 10 trials were recorded of which 5 trials were used for analysis. The dominant leg (right leg) were analyzed [39].

Ground reaction force analysis

Vicon Nexus 1.7 program was used to synchronize, record and calculate the kinematic and kinetic data. The sampling frequency was set to 1000 Hz for the signals from the force platform and at 100 Hz for the motion capture data. Each of the participant’s ground force reaction data was normalized using the participant’s individual weight. Inverse dynamics was used to calculate the joint moment forces. Left and right lower joint flexion/extension moments in the sagittal plane, the pronation moments in the frontal plane, and the internal rotation moment in the transverse plane were calculated and analyzed.

Exercise Program

The Pilates program was taken from BALANCED BODY (http://balanced body.com) mat program, which was performed 3 times a week for 10 weeks. The 60 minutes’ sessions consisted of 10 min warm-up, 40 min main exercise, and 10 min cool-down. The programs exercise intensity was set using the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and was set to vary from RPE 11-15. Details of the program are shown in <Table 2>.

Pilates program

Statistical Data analysis

Descriptive data (mean and standard deviation) and mixed design (split plot) repeated ANOVA were performed using SPSS 21.0. For further analysis, independent sample t-tests were used to evaluate the statistical significances between the groups, whereas paired t-tests were used to investigate the significant differences between the pre and post intervention effects. A significance level was set to p< 0.05.

Results

Kinetic changes of the lower extremities

The results of the kinetic changes between the Pilates and control group pre and post treatment are shown in <Table 3>. For the maximum knee flexion moment, there was no interaction between timing and group, and there was no major effect between timing and groups. However, for the Pilates group there was a significant decreased according to time (p<0.05). For the maximum knee joint extension moment, there was an interaction between timing and group (p<0.05), and there was no main effect between timing and groups. For the Pilates group there was a significant increase pre and post exercise (p<0.001).

Results for the kinetic data during gait for the pre and post treatment of the Pilates and control group

For the maximum adductor moment of the knee joint, there was no interaction between timing and group, and there was no main effect between timing and groups. For the maximum adductor moment of the hip joint, there was an interaction between timing and group (p<.001), and there was no main effect between timing and groups. There was a significant increased between the pre and post exercise (p<0.05) for the Pilates group, whereas there was a significant decreased in the control group (p<0.05).

For the maximum hip flexion moment, there was no main effect on the interaction between timing and group, and there was no major effect on the interaction between timing and groups. In the case of the maximum hip extension moment, there was no main effect on the interaction between timing and group, and there was no major effect on the interaction between timing and groups. However there a a significant decreased in the control group before and after exercise (p<0.01).

For the maximum internal rotational moment of the knee joint, there was no interaction between timing and groups, and there was no change between timing and groups. However, for the Pilates group there as a significant increase pre and post exercise (p<.01). For the maximum internal rotational moment of the hip joint, there was an interaction between the timing and the group (p<0.05), and there was also a main effect between the periods (p<.01). For the Pilates group there as a significant increase (p<0.05) but a significant decrease for the control group (p<0.05.).

Radiological changes of lower limb alignment

The results of pre and post X-ray data for the Pilates exercise and control group are shown in <Table 4>. For the alignment of the left knee joint, there was a main effect between groups (p<0.05) and between the Pilates pre and post exercise treatment (p<0.01). However, for the right knee joint, there was a significant difference between the groups but no other significant differences.

Results of the x-ray data for the left and right leg

Discussion

The main results of this study were that the maximum extension and internal rotation moments were significantly increased in the exercise group compared to the control group, whereas the flexion moment was significantly decreased. As expected, there was no change in the control group. The increase in the maximum extension moment of the knee joint in the end support phase of the exercise group and the decrease in the maximum flexion moment in the middle stance phase indicates that the participants is able to absorb shock more efficiently and can stabilize with the extensor muscles during walking [40]. The maximum adductor and internal rotational moments of the hip joint were significantly increased in the exercise group, whereas the extension and adductor moments were significantly decreased in the control group. According to Moisio et al. [40] these increases in the maximum adductor and internal rotational moments in the end-stage of the supporting phase of the exercise group indicates more hip joint muscle control [40]. As for the results of the x-rays, the left leg distanced from the anatomical axis to the weight bearing line was significantly reduced in the Pilates group. However, there was a tendency of a shorter distanced from the anatomical axis to the weight bearing line in the right leg, however it was not statistically significant. Whereas there were no significant changes in the control group for both legs.

The hip extension moment is well-known as a critical factor necessary for stability and to maximize step length due to controlling the knee joint, and the maximum extension moment occurs continuously when in forward motion during the stance phase. For patients with knee hip osteoarthritis, extension moment of the knee joint tends to be reduced and this reduces the walking speed as a strategy to reduce and prevent knee pain, by reducing the load on the knee joint [41]. According to Astephen et al. [1] optimal extension moments are important as a decrease in the extension moment increases the tension of the joint tissue during walking and disrupts the normal shock absorption mechanism and becomes a risk factor that decreases the stability of the knee joint during walking. In this study, the maximum extension moment value increased in the knee joint in the exercise group showing the positive effects of the Pilates exercise.

In this study, the maximum flexion moment significantly decreased in the mid-phase of the support phase of the knee joint in the exercise group. In general, an increase in the maximum flexion moment at the knee joint maybe indicator of knee joint deformation and is associated with compensatory movement [42]. Therefore, an increase in the knee flexion moment during walking causes instability and requires a lot of energy, which causes abnormal walking. Our data showed a reduction of the maximum knee flexion moment in the Pilates group, which is thought to be a direct effect of improving the hamstring flexibility, which is the knee flexor muscle. Additionally, any reduction in the knee flexion moment is judged to have a positive effect on the knee load during walking.

Our study shows that in the transverse plane, the maximum internal rotation moment increased in the end position of the knee joint in the exercise group. Similarly, it is reported [13] that the adolescence with genu varum portrayed larger internal rotation movements at the knee joint for adolescence with knee arthritis than age matched health control participants. However, in this study, after performing Pilates exercise for 10 weeks, the female college students (age 20-24), had a reduced the internal rotational moments at the knee joint. Additionally, the maximum adductor and internal rotational movements at the hip were significantly increased at the terminal stage of the support phase. Whereas, in Stief et al. study [13] the maximum adductor moment of the hip joint was decreased in the middle and end stance phases compared to normal adolescents. These two contradictory studies highlight the need for continued investigation of the effect of different ages and abnormal developments on gait performance, especially in terms of kinetics, i.e. joint moments.

There are numerous studies showing the effectiveness of Pilates training to help pelvic alignment, stability, and treating anterior pelvic tilt [43]. Some of the reasoning of why Pilates is so affective for the pelvic stability and alignment is the concentration of the program on the deep abdominal and multifidi muscles at the lumber-pelvic region [19]. Similarly, Kang and Kim [44] states that the strengthening of the hip extension muscles and abdominals helps improve the pelvic tilt. Pilates training has also been demonstrated to be effective in improving gait function and reducing hip joint pain for elderly patients suffering from chronic fractures [30]. However, in this study the Pilates group tended to show improvements on the maximum adductor moments of the knee, maximum hip flexion and extension moments, but they were not statistically significant. Some of the reasoning why the effect may have been minimal compared to other studies is the shorter time frame of the training, 10 weeks and that the majority of the Pilates program consisted of training the core more than the lower limbs. We suggest that for future studies aimed to help alleviate genu varum, the exercise program should include a combination of both trunk and lower body exercises, including more weight bearing conditions. We also recommend that the exercise time period should be long enough for the participant to have substantial gains in strength.

Interestingly, in this study, only the non-dominant left leg of the Pilates group showed a significant decrease in distance from anatomical axis to weight bearing line of female college students after 10 weeks of Pilates exercise. It is considered that the 10-week Pilates program was effective for the left, that is, the non-dominant leg, but the 10-week exercise period not enough time for the improvement of the dominant right leg. Good alignment of the knee joint is a critical factor for spreading the loading on the articular cartilage during standing and gait, which helps prevent the degeneration of the joint’s biomechanics [6,13].

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that the Pilates exercise group had improved in the extension and flexion moment in the knee, and the adductor and internal rotation moment in the hip during walking. Moreover, this change seemed to be due to the improvement in the knee alignment verified by the X-ray data, especially for the non-dominant left leg. However, for Pilates exercise to be a more effective treatment, we suggest that future studies should include more extended training periods with the inclusion of more body weight exercises.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a 2-Year Research Grant of Pusan National University.

Notes

The authors declare no conflict of interest and the founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

References

1. Jin X, Wang BH, Wang X, Antony B, Zhu Z, Han W, Cicuttini F, Wluka AE, Winzenberg T, Blizzard L, Jones G. Associations between endogenous sex hormones and MRI structural changes in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and cartilage 2017;25(7):1100–6. 2.
2. Davis JE, Harkey MS, Ward RJ, MacKay JW, Lu B, Price LL, Eaton CB, Barbe MF, Lo GH, McAlindon TE, Driban JB. Characterizing the distinct structural changes associated with self‐reported knee injury among individuals with incident knee osteoarthritis: Data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Clinical Anatomy 2018;31(3):330–4.
3. Magnusson K, Kumm J, Turkiewicz A, Englund M. A naturally aging knee, or development of early knee osteoarthritis? Osteoarthritis and cartilage 2018;26(11):1447–52.
4. Demehri S, Shakoor D. Structural changes in aging-knee vs early-knee osteoarthritis: review of current evidence and future challenges. Osteoarthritis and cartilage 2018;26(11):1412–4.
5. Hayes KW, Falconer J. Differential muscle strength decline in osteoarthritis of the knee. A developing hypothesis. Arthritis Care Res 1992;5(1):24–28.
6. Andrews M, Noyes FR, Hewett TE, Andriacchi TP. Lower limb alignment and foot angle are related to stance phase knee adduction in normal subjects: a critical analysis of the reliability of gait analysis data. J Orthop Res 1996;14(2):289–295.
7. Demehri S, Shakoor D. Structural changes in aging-knee vs early-knee osteoarthritis: review of current evidence and future challenges. Osteoarthritis and cartilage 2018;26(11):1412–4. 7.
8. Sharma L, Hurwitz DE, Thonar EJ, et al. Knee adduction moment, serum hyaluronan level, and disease severity in medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1998;41(7):1233–1240.
9. Frost HM. Perspectives: A biomechanical model of the pathogenesis of arthroses. Anat Rec 1994;240(1):19–31.
10. Issa SN, Dunlop D, Chang A, et al. Full-Iimb and Knee radiography assessments of varus-valgus alignment and their relationship to osteoarthritis disease features by magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum 2007;57(3):398–406.
11. Riener R, Rabuffetti M, Frigo C. Stair ascent and descent at different inclinations. Gait Posture 2002;15(1):32–44.
12. Kuitunen S, Komi PV, Kyröläinen H. Knee and ankle joint stiffness in sprint running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002;34(1):166–173.
13. Stief F, Böhm H, Dussa CU, et al. Effect of lower limb malalignment in the frontal plane on transverse plane mechanics during gait in young individuals with varus knee alignment. Knee 2014;21(3):688–693.
14. Hunt MA, Birmingham TB, Giggin JR, Jenkyn TR. Associations among knee adduction moment, frontal plane ground reaction force, and lever arm during walking in patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Biomech 2006;39(12):2213–2220.
15. Park SR, Ro HL, Namkoong S. The effect of stretching and elastic band exercises knee space distance and plantar pressure distribution during walking in young individuals with genu varum. J Korean Soc Phys Med 2017;12(1):83–91.
16. Bennie JA, Shakespear-Druery J, De Cocker K. Muscle-strengthening exercise epidemiology: a new frontier in chronic disease prevention. Sports Med Open 2020;6:40.
17. Bennell KL, Hunt MA, Wrigley TV, et al. Hip strengthening reduces symptoms but not knee load in people with medial knee osteoarthritis and varus malalignment: a randomised controlled trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010;18(5):621–628.
18. Carpes FP, Reinehr FB, Mota CB. Effects of a program for trunk strength and stability on pain, low back and pelvis kinematics, and body balance; A pilot study. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2008;12(1):22–30.
19. Cruz-Díaz D, Bergamin M, Gobbo S, Martínez-Amat A, Hita-Contreras F. Comparative effects of 12 weeks of equipment based and mat Pilates in patients with Chronic Low Back Pain on pain, function and transversus abdominis activation. A randomized controlled trial. Complementary therapies in medicine 2017;33:72–7.
20. Hrysomallis C, Goodman C. A review of resistance exercise and posture realignment. J Strength Cond Res 2001;15(3):385–390.
21. Katzman WB, Sellmeyer DE, Stewart AL, Wanek L, Hamel KA. Changes in flexed posture, musculoskeletal impairments, and physical performance after group exercise in community- dwelling older women. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88(2):192–199.
22. Schäfer AG, Zalpour C, von Piekartz H, Hall TM, Paelke V. The Efficacy of Electronic Health-Supported Home Exercise Interventions for Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee: Systematic Review. Journal of medical Internet research 2018;20(4)e152.
23. Thomas KS, Muir KR, Doherty M, Jones AC, O’Reilly SC, Bassey EJ. Home based exercise programme for knee pain and Osteoarthritis: randomised contrlled trial. BMJ 2002;325(7367):752.
24. Snarr RL, Wirbiezcas M, Colbert A, Langford E, Hogan G. Exercise Technique: Bodyweight BOSU Ball Exercises. Strength and Conditioning Journal September 18, 2020 volume publish ahead of print.
25. Betsch M, Kalbhen K, Michalik R, et al. The Influence of Smartphone Use on Spinal Posture-A Laboratory Study. Gait Posture 2021;85:298–303.
26. Tsuji T, Matuyama Y, Goto M, et al. Knee-spine syndrome: correlation between sacral inclination and patello-femoral joint pain. J Orthop Sci 2002;7(5):519–523.
27. Wells C, Kolt GS, Bialocerkowski A. Defining pilates exercise: a systematic review. Complement Ther Med 2012;20(4):253–262.
28. Kibler WB, Press J, Sciascia A. The role of core stability in athletic function. Sports Med 2006;36(3):189–198.
29. Cruz-Ferreir A, Fernandes J, Kuo YL, et al. Dose pilates-based exercise improve postural alignment in adult women? Women Health 2013;53(6):597–611.
30. Stivala A, Hartley G. The effects of a Pilates-based exercise rehabilitation program on functional outcome and fall risk reduction in an aging adult status-post traumatic hip fracture due to a fall. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2014;37(3):136–145.
31. Bryan M, Hawson S. The benefit of Pilates exercise in Orthopaedic rehabilitation. Techniques in Orthopaedics 2003;18(1):126–129.
32. Muscolino J. E., Cipriani S. Pilates and the “POWERHOUSE”. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2004;8(1):15–24.
33. Bernardo LA. The effectiveness of pilates training in healthy adults: an appraisal of the research literature. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2007;11(2):106–110.
34. Donahoe-Fillmore B, Hnahan NM, Mescher ML, Clapp DE, Addison NR, Weston CR. The effects of a home pilates program on muscle performance and postural in healthy females: a pilot study. Journal of Women’s Health Physical Therapy 2007;31(2):6–11.
35. Hrysomallis C, Goodman C. A review of resistance exercise and posture realignment. J Strength Conditioning Res 2001;15(3):385–390.
36. Kuo YL, Tully EA, Galea MP. Sagittal spinal posture after Pilates-based exercise in healthy older adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34(10):1046–1051.
37. Emery K, De Serres SJ, McMillan A, Côté JN. The effects of a Pilates training program on arm-trunk posture and movement. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2010;25(2):124–130.
38. Miyamoto GC, Franco KF, van Dongen JM, et al. Different doses of Pilates-based exercise therapy for chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial with economic evaluation. British journal of sports medicine 2018;52(13):859–68.
39. Teichtahl AJ, Wlukaak AE, Morris ME, Davis SR, Cicuttini FM. The associations between the dominet and nondominant external knee adductor moments during in healthy subject: evidence for symmetry. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90(2):320–324.
40. Moisio KC, Sumner DR, Shott S, Hurwitz DE. Normalization of joint moments during gait: a comparison of two techniques. J Biomech 2003;36(4):599–603.
41. Messier SP, DeVita P, Cowan RE, Seay J, Young HC, Marsh AP. Do older adults with knee osteoarthritis place greater loads on the knee during gait? a preliminary study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86(4):703–709.
42. Jenkyn TR, Hunt MA, Jones IC, Giffin JR, Birmingham TB. Toe-out gait in patients with knee osteoarthritis partially transforms external knee adduction moment into flexion moment during early stance phase of gait: A tri-planar kinetic mechanism. J Biomech 2008;41(5):276–283.
43. Deckert JA, Barry SM, Welsh TM. Analysis of Pelvic Alignment in University Ballet Majors. Journal of Dance Medicine & Science 2007;11(4):110–117.
44. Kang TW. The effects of stretching and strengthening exercise on the pain, pelvic tilt, functional disability index, and balance ability of patients with chronic lower back pain. J Kor Phys Ther 2019;31(1):7–12.

Article information Continued

Figure 1.

Full length weight bearing anterior radiograph measurement A: anatomical axis, B: weight bearing line, | ab |= distance from anatomical axis to weight bearing line.

Table 1.

Participants demographics

Pilates (n=15) Control (n=8)
Age (years) 19.62±1.38 21.2±1.09
Height (cm) 162.10±4.63 162.38±4.78
Weight (kg) 49.69±4.31 52.04±6.03
Body Mass Index (kg/m2) 18.87±1.38 19.86±3.34
Left leg genu varum (mm) 12.26±3.65 17.48±7.74
Right leg genu varum (mm) 14.71±7.38 17.65±7.64

Table 2.

Pilates program

order type time intensity frequency
warm-up ·feel weight on feet 10 min RPE 11-13 10 rep-2,3 sets (1-4 week) 3 days/wk
·standing roll down
·side reaches
·arm circles
·knee bounces
main exercise ·double knee circles 40 min
·hundred preparation
·hundred
·roll ups
·rolling like ball
·single leg stretches
·sing leg circles
·crisscrosses
·seals
·double leg stretches RPE 13-15 10 rep-4,5 sets (5-10 week)
·spine stretch forward
·spine side stretches
·side leg kicks
·side leg lifts
·side leg circles (I & II)
·side leg banana
·swimming
·swan
·single leg kicks
·breathing
·push ups
cool-down ·standing 10 min
·standing roll down
·shoulder up & down

Table 3.

Results for the kinetic data during gait for the pre and post treatment of the Pilates and control group

Pilates (n=15)
Control (n=8)
Pre Post Pre Post
Knee flexion (Nm/kg) 0.92±0.48 0.56±0.58* 0.75±0.42 0.89±0.27
Knee extension (Nm/kg)§ 0.38±0.33 0.94±0.47*** 0.54±0.43 0.44±0.59
Knee adduction (Nm/kg) 0.94±0.30 0.89±0.19 0.96±0.33 0.86±0.16
Hip adduction (Nm/kg) 1.35±0.23 1.51±0.22* 1.48±0.60 1.16±0.39*
Hip flexion (Nm/kg) 1.80±0.52 1.60±0.49 1.56±0.33 1.17±0.38
Hip extension (Nm/kg) -1.83±0.65 -1.64±0.50 -2.33±0.39 -1.43±0.33**
Knee internal rotation (Nm/kg) 0.35±0.9 0.44±0.08** 0.351±0.11 0.38±0.11*
Hip internal rotation (Nm/kg)§ 0.28±0.36 0.36±0.07* 0.32±0.10 0.37±0.10*

Indicates significant difference according to time *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001;

§

indicates interaction between groups and time p<0.05

Table 4.

Results of the x-ray data for the left and right leg

Pilates (n=15)
Control (n=8)
Pre Post Pre Post
Left leg (mm) 14.64±7.64 9.74±6.05** 17.61±8.10 13.46±6.26
Right leg (mm) 12.46±5.61 10.85±6.24 19.65±8.26 20.748±8.83

Indicates significant difference according to time **p<0.01