Effects of Regular Aerobic Exercise on Cardiovascular Health Factors and Heart Function in Sedentary Male Office Workers

Article information

Asian J Kinesiol. 2024;26(1):30-38

Publication date (electronic) : 2024 January 31

doi : https://doi.org/10.15758/ajk.2024.26.1.30

Department of Sport Science, College of Liberal Arts, Dongguk University, Gyeongju, Republic of Korea

^*Correspondence: Bo-Ae Lee, Department of Sport Science, College of Liberal Arts, Dongguk University, 38066, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Gyeongju, Republic of Korea; Tel: +82-54-770-2614; E-mail: balee2240@naver.com

Received 2023 October 4; Accepted 2023 November 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the effects of regular aerobic exercise on cardiovascular health factors and heart function in sedentary male office workers.

METHODS

To achieve this aim, 20 individuals were selected as subjects: 10 in the exercise group (who have been regularly exercising for over 5 years, more than 4 times per week, for 1 hour or more per workout) and 10 in the control group (defines sedentary behavior more of moderate-intensity exercise for 30 minutes or longer, at least three days a week). For data processing, the average and standard deviation were calculated using the SPSS 21.0 statistical program, and the difference in the mean value change between groups was verified by performing an independent t-test.

RESULTS

There were significant differences between groups in factors related to cardiovascular health, such as resting heart rate, maximum systolic blood pressure, maximum oxygen intake, and exercise duration. Regarding heart function, there were significant differences between both groups in peak velocities of early and atrial fillings, as well as in early and late diastolic annulus velocities.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, regular aerobic exercise appears to have a positive impact on cardiovascular health factors and heart function in sedentary male office workers.

Keywords: Aerobic Exercise; Cardiovascular Factors; Heart Function; Middle-Aged Male

Introduction

With the recent advances in science and technology, medical technology and equipment have substantially developed, leading to an increase in preventive examinations for the early detection of diseases. However, despite the increase in early detection, the mortality rate due to cardiovascular diseases and metabolic syndrome-related diseases, which are decreasing in developed countries, is increasing quite rapidly in South Korea [1].

In addition, related measures such as social distancing due to the COVID-19 pandemic have further contributed to the spread of metabolic syndrome [2,3]. This increasing trend of metabolic syndrome has been reported to increase the risk of serious secondary diseases such as cardiovascular diseases [4], thus emphasizing the urgency of raising awareness [5]. In modern society, people spend a substantial amount of time sitting down, which has led to mounting interest in the consequent decline in physical activity, that is, a sedentary lifestyle. Therefore, it has been stated that exercise to strengthen muscles is an essential and indispensable factor in preventing the risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders caused by an increase in sedentary lifestyle [6]. A sedentary lifestyle is defined as any waking behavior with an energy expenditure of 1.5 metabolic equivalents (METs) or less while sitting or reclining. However, the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) defines sedentary behavior more broadly as a lack of moderate-intensity exercise for 30 minutes or longer, at least three days a week for a period of three months [7].

In other words, it not only includes a sedentary lifestyle but also physical inactivity [8]. Recent studies on sedentary lifestyles have reported that it is linked to not only chronic diseases but also a higher mortality rate [9,10] and has an adverse impact on physical health [11]. Particularly, work-related physical activity may occur repeatedly without allowing for adequate time to stabilize the increased cardiovascular function, and repetition of this phenomenon intensifies physical fatigue in a perpetuated vicious cycle [12]. Repeated sedentary behavior is thus more likely to result in the accumulation of physical fatigue, which in turn will increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases [13].

In 2023, the World Health Organization (WHO) reported that cardiovascular diseases cause 17.9 million deaths worldwide each year and that more than four out of five people die due to coronary heart disease; furthermore, 80% of these premature deaths were attributed to preventable and treatable risk factors such as an unhealthy diet and a lack of physical activity [14]. Most previous studies have reported that physical activity and aerobic exercise positively affect cardiovascular diseases and heart function [15-17], but another study reported that long-term aerobic exercise induces cardiovascular diseases and affects heart function, causing cardiac dysfunction [18].

To date, the amount of exercise that improves cardiovascular health and reduces accidents related to cardiovascular diseases has not been defined [19]. While the function and structure of the heart of people who have performed aerobic exercise for a long period of time have been reported to be deformed, depending on the period and type of exercise [20], such structural features of the heart are not necessarily clearly distinguished; furthermore, these structural features have been argued to vary depending on the intensity, duration, and frequency of exercise [21]. And in a study aimed at investigating the effects of regular aerobic exercise training on the electrocardiograms of middle-aged male patients with heart disease, it was found that changes in ST-segment during maximum exercise were consistent with a decrease in heart rate and heart rate ratio at autonomic exercise intensity at the same exercise intensity [22].

In other words, cardiovascular diseases and heart function seem closely related to the intensity and duration of exercise [23]. Therefore, aerobic exercise is highly recommended for cardiovascular health management and improvement. Among the many forms of aerobic exercise, swimming is considered one of the safest, with a lower risk of injury compared to land exercise [24], and it is considered to be the best choice for physical activity [25]. Swimming has been reported to reduce joint loads by reducing gravity through buoyancy [26], and it is effective against the risk of heart disease because it increases the venous return rate with a streamlined posture [19].

Exercise is considered one of the most important treatment methods for patients with cardiovascular diseases and participating in cardiac rehabilitation and aerobic exercise has great clinical significance [15]. Despite these advantages, most studies related to cardiovascular diseases and heart function have mainly included land exercise, with a scarcity of scientific evidence correlating with swimming [27]. Furthermore, the beneficial effects of regular exercise on reducing cardiovascular risks are well-established [28,29], but the most convenient and beneficial “dose” of exercise to achieve this goal remains unclear [30]. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the positive and negative effects of regular health promotion behaviors on the cardiovascular health factors and heart function of middle-aged sedentary male office workers.

Methods

Subjects

All study subjects were healthy sedentary male office workers. The exercise group consisted of individuals who have been swimming regularly for over 5 years, more than 4 times per week, for 1 hour or more per workout, with an exercise intensity rating of perceived exertion (RPE) of 11–15 (Selected after surveying swimming lovers in S area through a questionnaire). The control group consisted of individuals who had not engaged in adequate physical activity, per the ACSM’s definition of a sedentary lifestyle. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of P University prior to the commencement of this study (PNU IRB/2015_31_HR). Those with diseases that could affect the heart were excluded from this study. presents the general characteristics of the subjects <Table 1>.

Table 1.

General characteristics of subjects.

Measurements and Statistical Analysis

Metrics

Body composition measurements (weight, body fat percentage, and body mass index), an exercise load test (resting and exercise heart rates and blood pressure (BP), rest and exercise electrocardiograms, cardiorespiratory fitness, myocardial ischemia, and arrhythmia), and echocardiography (heart function) were conducted as part of the study analysis.

Methods

Body composition

The subjects were asked to control their food intake for 3 hours before the study, rest for 30 minutes, and wear simple clothing without metal components before body composition measurements were performed. Their body weight, body fat percentage, and body mass index were measured using a body composition tester from Bio-Space.

Exercise load test

To test the exercise load, a treadmill exercise load test (Medtrack ST55, Quimtom, USA) was performed according to the Bruce Protocol. The subjects were asked to eat 5 hours before the experiment and rest for 30 minutes after arriving at the laboratory. The endpoint of the maximal exercise was set as the time when the heart rate did not increase anymore and was 17 or higher on the Borg Scale. The resting heart rate (HR) and resting and exercise BP were measured with a mercury sphygmomanometer. The maximum oxygen intake (VO₂max), and maximum exercise time (minute) obtained by the exercise load test were recorded.

Echocardiography

Prior to measuring the heart function, the subjects were asked to rest for 10 minutes after arriving at the hospital. M-mode echocardiograms were recorded using a Sequoir 256 ultrasound machine and a 5-MHz transducer by a nurse specializing in echocardiography. Tissue-pulsed Doppler echocardiography was performed to examine the cardiac diastolic function by measuring the following mitral valve peak velocity variables: peak velocity of early filling (E), peak velocity of atrial filling (A), E/A ratio; and deceleration time (DT). Mitral annulus velocity variables, such as early diastolic annulus velocity (E’), late diastolic annulus velocity (A’), E’/A’ ratio, and E/E’ ratio, were also measured.

Measurement Tools

Measurement tools for the study are as follows <Table 2>.

Table 2.

Measurement Tools.

Data Processing

All data were analyzed by calculating the average value (mean) and standard deviation (SD) of the measured yield using the SPSS version 21.0 program. To verify the differences in average values between groups, an independent sample t-test was performed with the statistical significance level set at (α) = 0.05.

Results

Effects on Cardiovascular Health Factors

The resting heart rate (t=-4.200, p<0.01), resting diastolic BP (t=-4199, p<0.01), VO₂max (t=4.111, p<0.01), and exercise duration (t=4.415, p<0.01) differed significantly between the two groups, but the MHR and RSBP were not significantly different. Furthermore, the MSBP and MDBP between groups were not statistically significantly different <Table 3>.

Table 3.

Comparative analysis of cardiovascular factors.

Effects on Heart Function

The A-velocity (t=-2.210, p<0.05), E/A ratio (t=-3.563, p<0.01), E’-velocity (t=3.477, p<0.01), and E’/A’ ratio (t=2.687, p<0.05) differed significantly between both groups, but the E-velocity and DT were not significantly different. Furthermore, the A’-velocity and E/E’ ratio between groups were not statistically significantly different <Table 4>.

Table 4.

Comparative analysis of heart function.

Discussion

This study aimed to investigate and discuss the positive and negative aspects of swimming by analyzing the effects of regular aerobic exercise on sedentary male office workers’ cardiovascular health factors and heart function. While cardiovascular diseases account for a large portion of mortality and morbidity worldwide [31,32], as an intervention for the primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases, individuals are recommended to detect their long-term risks and manage their health [33,34]. The structural remodeling of the heart through exercise [35] is one of the major contributing factors to cardiovascular diseases [36], and regular physical activity and exercise have been reported to reduce the occurrence of cardiovascular diseases by lowering the resting heart rate [37]. In this study, the resting heart rate was close to bradycardia in the exercise group, which was considered a positive effect of aerobic exercise by previous studies [38]. It also seems to be associated with a positive rise in VO₂max and ED.

Lower resting BP is a positive effect that can be expected from aerobic exercise because resting hypertension is a representative risk factor for cardiovascular diseases [39].

In this study, the exercise group had a lower resting BP than the control group, which was in agreement with a report that indicated that lowering BP through exercise by 4–9 mmHg is a positive effect of exercise [40]. Additionally, another study reported that short-term aerobic exercise positively affects BP [41].

Furthermore, the VO₂max is considered the cardiovascular health factor on which aerobic exercise has the most important and positive effect, and it also acts as an important index for evaluating the prognosis of patients with cardiovascular diseases [42]. A higher level of VO₂max was observed in the exercise group, which was in agreement with previous study results that indicated that aerobic exercise increased the recruitment of motor units by efficiently using oxygen in the peripheral muscles, prevented muscle fiber atrophy, and increased the VO₂max [15].

In addition to the VO₂max, the exercise time representing the ability to sustain exercise was the same as the VO₂max. This was considered a natural outcome because an increase in the VO₂max—which is the amount of oxygen consumed per 1 kg of body weight per minute and a measure of aerobic fitness [43]—led to an improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness and an increase in total body endurance [44].

Furthermore, although no statistically significant numerical results were found, the systolic BP during the maximum exercise of the exercise group shown in this study exceeded 200 mmHg, and there seemed to be concern regarding exercise-induced hypertension, with a 5- to 10-fold higher risk of leading to hypertension at rest [45], which was an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases [46]. Studies have reported that regular exercise significantly affects heart function by improving the level of cardiac autophagy, promoting the proliferation of cardiomyocytes, and reducing local tissue inflammation [47-49]. These changes in heart function have been reported to vary depending on the type, intensity, and time of exercise [49], and long-term aerobic exercise has been reported to increase the internal diameter of the left ventricle, thicken the septum and posterior wall of the ventricle, or cause eccentric hypertrophy without change [50, 51]. This eccentric hypertrophy is characterized by an increased ventricular internal diameter and a large left ventricular volume, resulting in a high stroke rate [52].

Therefore, the significant differences in peak velocity of early filling, peak velocity of atrial filling, and mitral annulus velocity in this study are considered to have been caused by eccentric hypertrophic remodeling through aerobic exercise. This is due to the mechanism by which the mitral valve opens and blood flows in when the pressure in the left atrium, which begins to rise immediately after myocardial contraction, is higher than that in the left ventricle [53]. In other words, the heart generally exhibits physiological and anatomical adaptations in response to chronic endurance exercise [54].

The peak velocity of early filling (E) was higher than the peak velocity of atrial filling (A). The E/A ratio is a value that reflects the myocardial relaxation function, and the normal range is 1 or higher. The numerical results of this study were also within the normal range for both groups. These results were consistent with the results of previous studies that analyzed cross-sectional comparisons between the exercise group and control group and reported an improved or normal E/A ratio in the exercise group [55-57].

However, another study reported that the higher E/A ratio in the exercise group compared to that in the control group was not clinically significant [58], which made it difficult to give meaning to the difference between the exercise and control groups, with all significant results between groups in this study being within the normal range.

Additionally, the DT is the time of mitral valve blood flow decelerating in the early diastolic period, and 220 m/s or less is considered normal. While a previous study reported that it was lower in the exercise group than in the general population [59], it was higher in the exercise group in this study, thus showing opposite results. However, the results of both groups were within the normal range, and no statistically significant results were found. In addition, the E’/A’ ratio, which is the ratio between the early diastolic annulus velocity (E’) and the late diastolic annulus velocity (A’), was higher in the exercise group, and a significant difference was also found between the groups. A similar preceding study reported that the exercise group that received endurance training regularly had a higher E’/A’ ratio than the control group [51], however, another study reported no difference in the E’/A’ among endurance athletes, resistance athletes, and Olympic (complex) athletes [60]. Therefore, this study’s findings suggest that, compared to other types of exercise, aerobic exercise can be expected to be relatively more appropriate because it results in the characteristics of eccentric hypertrophy with no clear pattern of myocardial deformation. However, further research on this topic is needed.

Finally, the E/E’ is the ratio of the peak velocity of early filling to the early diastolic annulus velocity, and it is a good indicator of left ventricular filling pressure. An E/E’ less than 8 was reported to be normal, but an E/E’ that is 15 or more was reported to be abnormal. Since the E/E’ was not affected by exercise [61,60], the results of this study showed no significant difference between the groups, and the values of both groups were less than 8 and within the normal range.

Conclusions

This study investigated the effect of regular aerobic exercise on cardiovascular health factors and heart function in sedentary male office workers and drew the following conclusions. In terms of cardiovascular health factors, the resting heart rate, resting diastolic BP, VO₂max, and exercise duration differed significantly between both groups, but the MHR, RSBP, MSBP, and MDBP between both groups were not significantly different. In terms of heart function, the A-velocity, E/A ratio, E’-velocity, and E’/A’ ratio between groups were significantly different, but the E-velocity, DT, A’-velocity, and E/E’ ratio between groups were not significantly different.

These results suggest that even for variables that had not shown statistically significant results, the exercise group showed positive effects on all numerical values. This indicates that regular aerobic exercise positively affects cardiovascular health factors and heart function in sedentary male office workers.

Acknowledgements

The authors received no financial support for this article.

Notes

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

1. Cho JY, Ye SY. Analysis of the relationship between fatty pancreas and cardiovascular disease in abdominal ultrasonography. J Kor Soc Radiology 2019;13:729–37.

2. Auriemma RS, Pirchio R, Liccardi A, et al. Metabolic syndrome in the era of COVID-19 outbreak: Impact of lockdown on cardiometabolic health. J Endocrinol Invest 2021;44(12):2845–47.

3. Xu W, Li Y, Yan Y, et al. Effects of coronavirus disease 2019 lockdown on metabolic syndrome and its components among Chinese employees: A retrospective cohort study. Front Public Health 2022;10:885013.

4. Mottillo S, Filion KB, Genest J, et al. The metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56(14):1113–32.

5. Reljic D, Frenk F, Herrmann HJ, et al. Maximum heart rateand lactate threshold-based low-volume high-intensity interval training prescriptions provide similar health benefits in metabolic syndrome patients. Healthcare 2023;11(5):711.

6. Lee HW, An SH, Jeon KK. Effect of Core Stabilization Intervention Program on Erector Spinae Contractile Properties and Isokinetic Muscle Function in Adults with Sedentary Lifestyle Patterns. Kor J Sport Bio 2022;32(3):103–110.

7. Kim YS. ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription Hanmi Medicine; 2022.

8. Tremblay MS, Aubert S, Barnes JD, et al. Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN): Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2017;14(1):1–17.

9. O’Donoghue G, Perchoux C, Mensah K, et al. A systematic review of correlates of sedentary behaviour in adults aged 18-65 years: A socio-ecological approach. BMC Public Health 2016;16:163.

10. Thorp AA, Owen N, Neuhaus M, et al. Sedentary behaviors and subsequent health outcomes in adults: A systematic review of longitudinal studies, 1996-2011. Am J Prev Med 2011;41(2):207–15.

11. Park SY, Yun DH. The effects of types of physical activity and sedentary behavior on subjective health and perceived stress. Kor J Phys Ed 2019;58(4):139–52.

12. Holtermann A, Krause N, van der Beek AJ, et al. The physical activity paradox: six reasons why occupational physical activity (OPA) does not confer the cardiovascular health benefits that leisure time physical activity does. Br J Sports Med 2018;52(3):149–50.

13. Sorokin AV, Araujo CGS, Zweibel S, et al. Atrial fibrillation in endurance-trained athletes. Br J Sports Med 2011;45(3):185–88.

14. World Health Organization. Cardiovascular Diseases World Health Organization. Geneva. Switzerland: 2023.

15. Sim YJ, Kim SH, Her AS, et al. Aerobic cardiac rehabilitation exercise for cardiovascular disease. Kor Jo Sports Sci 2016;14:23–33.

16. Ji MJ, Cho CE, Lee SW. Cardiometabolic disease risk in normal weight obesity and exercise interventions for proactive prevention. Exerc Sci 2022;31(3):282–94.

17. Yoon HM, Nam SA, Kim HB. The impact of center and home based aerobic exercise programs on cardiopulmonary function and body composition for cardiac patients. Kor Aca Cardiorespiratory Phy Therapy 2014;2:21–29.

18. Maetinez V, Sanz De La Garza M, Grazioli G, et al. Cardiac adaptation to endurance exercise training: Differential impact of swimming and running. Eur J Sport Sci 2021;21(6):844–53.

19. Lee BA, Kim YJ. Effect of regular endurance exercises on management of cardiovascular health in middle-aged men. J Exerc Rehabil 2022;18(1):50–56.

20. Paterick TE, Gordon T, Spiegel D. Echocardiography: Profiling of the athlete’s heart. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2014;27(9):940–48.

21. Pluim BM, Zwinderman AH, van der Laarse A, et al. A meta-analysis of cardiac structure and function. Circulation 2000;101(3):336–44.

22. Yeo NH, Kim SS. The effect of aerobic exercise training on blood pressure and electrocardiogram (ECG) in chronic heart failure. Kor Socie Exerc Physiol 2001;10(1):31–41.

23. Kim YJ, Park Y, Kang DH, et al. Excessive exercise habits in marathoners as novel indicators of masked hypertension. Biomed Res Int 2017;2017:1342842.

24. Lee BA, Kim Y, Kim YM, et al. Anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of aquatic exercise in allergic airway inflammation in mice. Front Physiol 2019;10:1227.

25. Lee HH, Kim H, Lee JW, et al. Maternal swimming during pregnancy enhances short-term memory and neurogenesis in the hippocampus of rat pups. Brain Dev 2006;28:147–54.

26. Kelly M, Darrah J. Aquatic exercise for children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2005;47(12):838–42.

27. Martínez V, Sanz-de la Garza M, Domenech-Ximenos B, et al. Cardiac and pulmonary vascular remodeling in endurance open water swimmers assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance: impact of sex and sport discipline. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021;8:719113.

28. Nocon M, Hiemann T, Müller-Riemenschneider F, et al. Association of physical activity with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2008;15(3):239–46.

29. Loef M, Walach H. The combined effects of healthy lifestyle behaviors on all cause mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med 2012;55(3):163–70.

30. Sanz de la Garza M, Grazioli G, Bijnens BH, et al. Inter-individual variability in right ventricle adaptation after an endurance race. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2016;23(10):1114–24.

31. Studziński K, Tomasik T, Krzysztoń J, et al. Effect of using cardiovascular risk scoring in routine risk assessment in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: An overview of systematic reviews. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2019;19(1):11.

32. Yang IT, Hemphill LC, Kim JH, et al. To fast or not to fast: Lipid measurement and cardiovascular disease risk estimation in rural sub-Saharan Africa. J Glob Health 2020;10(1):010407.

33. Veronesi G, Gianfagna F, Giampaoli S, et al. Validity of a long-term cardiovascular disease risk prediction equation for low-incidence populations: the CAMUNI-MATISS Cohorts Collaboration Study. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2015;22(12):1618–25.

34. Ekoru K, Murphy GAV, Young EH, et al. Deriving an optimal threshold of waist circumference for detecting cardiometabolic risk in sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Obes 2017;42(3):487–94.

35. Patil HR, O’Keefe JH, Lavie CJ, et al. Cardiovascular damage resulting from chronic excessive endurance exercise. Mo Med 2012;109(4):312–21.

36. Sanz-de la Garza M, Grazioli G, Bijnens BH, et al. Acute, exercise dose-dependent impairment in atrial performance during an endurance race: 2D ultrasound speckle-tracking strain analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;9(12):1380–88.

37. Riebe D, Franklin BA, Thompson PD, et al. Updating ACSM’s recommendations for exercise preparticipation health screening. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2015;47(11):2473–79.

38. Mont L, Elosua R, Brugada J. Endurance sport practice as a risk factor for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. Europace 2009;11(1):11–17.

39. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2015 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2015;131(4):434–41.

40. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: The JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003;289(19):2560–72.

41. Kim H, Eun Y, Kim SH. Term cardiovascular endurance exercise on body composition and blood pressure. Kor J Family Practice 2020;10:9–14.

42. Fletcher GF, Balady G, Froelicher VF, et al. Exercise standards. A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Writing Group. Circulation 1995;91(2):580–615.

43. Yun SM, Lee MY, Lee DT. Relationship between aerobic exercise capacity and gut microbiome composition factors in adult males. Kor Soc Wellness 2022;17:341–46.

44. Potempa K, Braun L, Tinknell T, et al. Benefits of aerovic exercise after stroke. Sports Med 1996;21(5):337–46.

45. Singh JP, Larson MG, Manolio TA, et al. Blood pressure response during treadmill testing as a risk factor for new-onset hypertension. The Framingham heart study. Circulation 1999;99(14):1831–36.

46. Tzemos N, Lim PO, Mackenzie IS, et al. Exaggerated exercise blood pressure response and future cardiovascular disease. J Clin Hypertens 2015;17(11):837–44.

47. Bernardo BC, Ooi JYY, Weeks KL, et al. Understanding key mechanisms of exercise-induced cardiac protection to mitigate disease: current knowledge and emerging concepts. Physiol Rev 2018;98(1):419–75.

48. Boström P, Mann N, Wu J, et al. C/EBPβ controls exercise-induced cardiac growth and protects against pathological cardiac remodeling. Cell 2010;143(7):1072–83.

49. Liu X, Xiao J, Zhu H, et al. miR-222 is necessary for exercise-induced cardiac growth and protects against pathological cardiac remodeling. Cell Metab 2015;21(4):584–95.

50. Vinereanu D, Florescu N, Sculthorpe N, et al. Left ventricular long-axis diastolic function is augmented in the hearts of endurance-trained compared with strengthtrained athletes. Clin Sci 2002;103(3):249–57.

51. Barbier J, Ville N, Kervio G, et al. Sports-specific features of athlete’s heart and their relation to echocardiographic parameters. Herz 2006;31(6):531–43.

52. Ellestad MH. Chronotropic incompetence. The implications of heart rate response to exercise. Circulation 1996;93(8):1485–87.

53. Hurrell DG, Nishimura RA, Ilstrup DM, et al. Utility of preload alteration in assessment of left ventricular filling pressure by Doppler echocardiography: A simultaneous catheterization and Doppler echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30(2):459–67.

54. Burtscher J, Vanderriele PE, Legrand M, et al. Could Repeated Cardio-Renal Injury Trigger Late Cardiovascular Sequelae in Extreme Endurance Athletes? Sports Med 2022;52(12):2821–36.

55. Douglas PS, O’Toole ML, Hiller WD, et al. Left ventricular structure and function by echocardiography in ultraendurance athletes. Am J Cardiol 1986;58(9):805–09.

56. MacFarlane N, Northridge DB, Wright AR, et al. A comparative study of left ventricular structure and function in elite athletes. Br J Sports Med 1991;25(1):45–48.

57. George KP, Gates PE, Whyte G, et al. Echocardiographic examination of cardiac structure and function in elite cross trained male and female alpine skiers. Br J Sports Med 1999;33(2):93–98.

58. Claessens P, Claessens C, Claessens M, et al. Ventricular premature beats in triathletes: still a physiological phenomenon? Cardiology 1999;92(1):28–38.

59. Naylor LH, Arnolda LF, Deague JA, et al. Reduced ventricular flow propagation velocity in elite athletes is augmented with the resumption of exercise training. J Physiol 2005;563(Pt 3):957–63.

60. Caselli S, Di Paolo FM, Pisicchio C, et al. Patterns of left ventricular diastolic function in Olympic athletes. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015;28(2):236–44.

61. Nottin S, Nguyen LD, Terbah M, et al. Left ventricular function in endurance-trained children by tissue Doppler imaging. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004;36(9):1507–13.

Article information Continued

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Subject Item	Age (years)	Weight (kg)	height (cm)	Gbody mass index (kg/m²)	Body fat (%)
Exercise group (m=10)	46.40±3.86	69.89±6.41	168.77±6.71	24.44±1.79	20.95±6.87
Control group (m=10)	49.80±3.11	73.55±9.13	173.40±5.66	24.42±2.21	23.42±4.96

Instrument	Model/nationality	Measurement items
Body composition	Inbody430 Bio - space/ Korea	Body weight, body fat percentage, body mass index
Exercise load test	Treadmill: Medtrack ST 55, Quinton Instrument Co)/U.S.A	Resting heart rate, Resting and exercise blood pressure, Borg Scale, Maximal oxygen uptake, Respiratory exchange ratio, Maximum load and maximum oxygen consumption, Exercise duration, ST elevation Changes, arrhythmia
	Electrocardiogram: CG: Quinton stress test system (Q4500, Quinton Instrument CO)/U.S.A
	Gas Analysis: Quinton metabolic cart (QMC, Quinton Instrument CO)/USA
	Blood Pressure: Med-del 412, Quinton Instrument Co)/U.S.A
Echocardiography	Sequoir 256 (Acuson, Mountainview, CA)/U.S.A	Peak mitral velocity early filling, Peak atrial velocity early filling, Ratio of peakmitral early and atrial filling velocities, Deceleration time, Early diastolic annulus velocity, Late diastolic annulus velocity, Ratio of early diastolic annulus velocity and late diastolic annulus velocity, Ratio of peak mitral early and early diastolic annulus velocity

Variable	Group	Mean ± Sd	t-test	P-value
RHR (beats/min)	Exercise	60.00±8.94	-4.200	0.001^**
RHR (beats/min)	Control	77.40±9.57	-4.200	0.001^**
MHR (beats/min)	Exercise	188.30±31.89	1.004	0.340
MHR (beats/min)	Control	178.00±6.00	1.004	0.340
RSBP (mmHg)	Exercise	122.00±7.43	-0.710	0.487
RSBP (mmHg)	Control	124.60±5.45	-0.710	0.487
RDBP (mmHg)	Exercise	73.40±8.84	-4199	0.001^**
RDBP (mmHg)	Control	87.20±5.45	-4199	0.001^**
MSBP (mmHg)	Exercise	203.20±16.33	0.639	0.531
MSBP (mmHg)	Control	198.60±15.83	0.639	0.531
MDBP (mmHg)	Exercise	74.40±14.61	-1.076	0.303
MDBP (mmHg)	Control	79.80±6.17	-1.076	0.303
VO₂max (ml/kg/min)	Exercise	45.25±3.80	4.111	0.001^**
VO₂max (ml/kg/min)	Control	38.43±3.62	4.111	0.001^**
ED (sec)	Exercise	736.60±131.57	4.415	0.001^**
ED (sec)	Control	559.20±64.18	4.415	0.001^**

Variable	Group	Mean ± Sd	t-test	P-value
E-velocity (m/sec)	Exercise	72.21±10.49	-0.506	0.619
E-velocity (m/sec)	Control	70.86±13.52	-0.506	0.619
A-velocity (m/sec)	Exercise	46.99±8.31	-2.210	0.044^*
A-velocity (m/sec)	Control	58.71±4.56	-2.210	0.044^*
E/A ratio (%)	Exercise	1.45±.18	3.563	0.003^**
E/A ratio (%)	Control	1.07±.28	3.563	0.003^**
DT (m/sec)	Exercise	217.50±37.98	1.420	0.174
DT (m/sec)	Control	195.70±30.25	1.420	0.174
E'-velocity (m/sec)	Exercise	11.10±.56	3.477	0.004^**
E'-velocity (m/sec)	Control	9.55±1.29	3.477	0.004^**
A'-velocity (m/sec)	Exercise	8.80±1.81	1-0.580	0.569
A'-velocity (m/sec)	Control	9.22±1.39	1-0.580	0.569
E'/A' ratio (%)	Exercise	1.34±.33	2.687	0.020^*
E'/A' ratio (%)	Control	1.04±.12	2.687	0.020^*
E/E' ratio (%)	Exercise	5.88±.96	-1.139	0.271
E/E' ratio (%)	Control	6.45±1.25	-1.139	0.271