Asian J Kinesiol Search

CLOSE


Asian J Kinesiol > Volume 26(3); 2024 > Article
Lee, Kim, and An: Meta-analysis of the Correlation between Sport Achievement Goal Orientation and Sport Confidence in Korea

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to meta-analyze the correlation between sport achievement goal orientation and sport-confidence in Korea.

METHODS

Academic databases (DBpia, KCI, NAL, RISS) were used to search for literature for the metaanalysis. Based on the selection criteria, 22 journal articles and 12 dissertations were selected. The R program was used to calculate publication bias and effect sizes.

RESULTS

The correlation coefficients of sport achievement goal orientation and sport-confidence variables showed no publication bias, and the meta-analysis was analyzed with a random effects model due to high heterogeneity. The meta-analysis of the correlations between task-orientation achievement goals and sportconfidence variables showed large effect sizes, and among ego-orientation achievement goals and sportconfidence variables, proving skills showed a large effect size. A meta-analysis of the correlation between ego-orientation achievement goals and physical/mental preparation, coach leadership, and social support found moderate effect sizes.

CONCLUSIONS

Task-orientation achievement goals was more strongly associated with sport-confidence than ego-orientation achievement goals. However, setting goals that take into account both task-orientation and ego-orientation achievement goals may be more effective in improving sport-confidence.

Introduction

Along with achievement goal theory, sport-confidence and performance are important factors in understanding optimal exercise performance [1]. Achievement goals are the desire to develop, acquire, and demonstrate one’s abilities in a particular situation and are synchronized in different ways depending on how a particular situation is perceived [2]. Athletes achieve different levels of achievement depending on their goals, and the goal orientation of an individual greatly influences their level of effort and motivation [3]. Achievement goal orientation is a very important factor because it has a significant impact on athletic performance through differences in cognition and behavior depending on the goals of the individual athlete [4]. Achievement goal orientation has been categorized into task-orientation achievement goals and ego-orientation achievement goals depending on how athletes interpret their competence in sports [5]. Task-goal oriented learners are concerned with evaluating their own mastery of a task and themselves, whereas ego-goal oriented learners are concerned with evaluating their abilities relative to others [6]. Achievement goal orientation is an individual’s inherent tendency and is a necessary criterion for predicting successful sport performance [7]. Most sports participants possess both traits [6,8]. However, they are independent of each other because task-orientation achievement goals values the process of learning and experiencing achievement with the goal of mastery, while ego-orientation achievement goals focuses on performance and tends to be evaluated as superior to others, with an emphasis on winning [9].
Self-confidence refers to the trust, belief, and positive thinking about oneself that one can successfully tackle various athletic performance tasks without avoiding them, and is not a function of an individual’s capabilities, but rather a state of mind in the most common sense of being able to successfully accomplish something, i.e., a belief in success [1]. Sport-confidence is an important psychological variable that aids athletes in their performance [10] and is an important factor in achieving peak performance in competitive sporting activities [11]. Sport-confidence, which is related to achievement goal orientation, refers to the degree of confidence one has in one’s ability to successfully perform the skills one possesses when engaging in sporting activities [12]. Therefore, athletes with high self-confidence are more likely to be active in sport participation and achievement activities, view difficult tasks as challenging, and strive to achieve the goals they set [13]. Therefore, sport-confidence is considered to be an important psychological factor for successful sports activities along with achievement goal orientation [14].
Sport achievement goal orientation and sport-confidence seem to be closely related and positively influenced by sport performance, and studies in the sport field have shown that athletes’ achievement goal orientation predicts self-confidence [15,16]. It would be valuable to further analyze the relationship between sport achievement goal orientation and sport-confidence. Therefore, a meta-analysis will be conducted to synthesize the studies that have analyzed the correlation between sport achievement goal orientation and sport self-confidence. Meta-analysis is a method of systematic analysis using quantitative data to synthesize and understand multiple studies on the same topic [17]. It refers to an approach that statistically synthesizes the results of individual empirical studies and has the advantage of further organizing and generalizing knowledge in a specific field [18]. In particular, the results of statistical hypothesis testing, which constitutes the majority of quantitative studies, are significantly affected by sample size, and many researchers are facing criticism that arbitrary interpretation of significance is prevalent, so meta-analysis is attracting attention as a new research method that can overcome the shortcomings of individual studies [19]. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to conduct a meta-analysis of the correlation between sport achievement goal orientation and sport-confidence studied in Korea. The results of this study can provide a basis for the application of sports psychological skills training to improve athletic performance.

Methods

Data Search

The literature search covered academic articles and theses published in Korea until March 2024. The academic databases for the literature search were DBpia, Korea Citation Index (KCI), National Assembly Library (NAL), and Research Information Sharing Service (RISS). The literature search on the correlation between sport achievement goal orientation and sport-confidence was conducted by entering ‘achievement goal orientation and sport-confidence’ in each academic database.

Selection Criteria

For the meta-analysis of the correlation between sport achievement goal orientation and sport-confidence, the following selection criteria were set. First, we selected only studies that were conducted on Korean participants. Second, we selected articles that analyzed the correlation between sport achievement goal orientation variables (task-orientation achievement goals, ego-orientation achievement goals) and sport-confidence variables (physical/mental preparation, coach leadership, social support, and proving skills). Third, the correlation coefficient (r) and number of participants (n) between sport achievement goal orientation variables and sport-confidence variables were selected for meta-analysis. Fourth, journal articles were prioritized if they were published as dissertations. Fifth, the research design type of the literature was survey research. Sixth, we excluded articles that were not available in academic databases (online) or were private.
The Task and Ego Orientation in Sport Questionnaire (TEOSQ) was developed by Duda [20] using Nicholls’ theory [21] and applied to the sport context, and the Sources of Sport Confidence Questionnaire (SSCQ) was developed by Vealey et al. [22] using the Korean version of the questionnaire.

Selection Process

For the meta-analysis, we searched each academic database and found 55 journal articles and 41 dissertations in DBpia, 48 journal articles in KCI, 48 journal articles and 35 dissertations in NAL, 61 journal articles and 76 dissertations in RISS. We excluded duplicates 143 journal articles and 76 dissertations and excluded 21 journal articles and 38 dissertations categorized by title and abstract. We further reviewed the remaining literature and excluded 13 articles with missing analysis variables, 32 with inconsistent analysis variables, 4 with duplicate publications, and 3 with unavailable full text. In the end, we selected 34 literatures, including 22 journal articles and 12 dissertations. The process of selecting literatures for analysis (PRISMA flow diagram; Moher et al., 2009) is shown in <Figure 1>.

Coding

We coded the authors, year of publication, type of publication, number of participants, and number of correlates analyzed <Table 1>. In order to conduct a meta-analysis, clear criteria for coding must be presented, and agreement and reliability among coders must be verified [23]. For this purpose, the final coding of the selected articles was performed by two PhDs in sport psychology, and one professor majoring in sport psychology was consulted in case of discrepancies during the coding process.

Statistical Analysis

Meta-analysis was performed using the R program (ver. 4.3.3). The correlation coefficient (r) and the number of participants (n) between the sport achievement goal orientation and sport-confidence variables were used to extract the effect size and converted to Fisher’s Z value. Fisher’s Z-value is a standardized value that more closely follows a normal distribution, allowing for comparison of effect sizes between studies regardless of sample size [24]. To obtain more stable statistics for individual studies, inverse variance weights were used [25]. Meta-analysis is a process of weighting the effect sizes of individual studies to calculate the effect size of all studies, i.e., the average effect size, and explaining the meaning of the effect size by examining its significance. The interpretation of the correlation coefficient effect size is considered to be a small effect size of .10 or less, a moderate effect size of .25, and a large effect size of .40 or more [26].
Q and I2 values were utilized to test the homogeneity and heterogeneity between the sport achievement goal orientation and sport-confidence variables in the analyzed literature. A larger Q value indicates a difference in effect size between studies [27], and an I² of 25% was considered to indicate low heterogeneity, 50% moderate heterogeneity, and 75% or more very high heterogeneity [28]. In addition, the heterogeneity was generally judged to be substantial if the ratio of the actual variance to the total variance (I2) was greater than 50% and the significance of the homogeneity test was less than .01 [28]. If heterogeneity was considered high, a random-effects model was used, and if heterogeneity was considered low, a fixed-effects model was used. To test for publication bias, we conducted Egger’s regression analysis [29].

Results

Publication Bias

Regression analysis was conducted to meta-analyze the relationship between sport achievement goal orientation variables and sport-confidence variables. The results showed that task-orientation achievement goals and physical/mental preparation had a bias of -.71 (t=-.17, df=28, p=.87), task-orientation achieve-ment goals and coach leadership had a bias of 0.95 (t=.27, df=27, p=.79), task-orientation achievement goals and social support had a bias of -1.87 (t=-.53, df=29, p=.60), task-orientation achievement goals and proving skills had a bias of 2.72 (t=.74, df=31, p=. 46), ego-orientation achievement goals and physical/mental preparation had a bias=-1.43 (t=-.43, df=28, p=.65), ego-orientation achievement goals and coach leadership had a bias=3.97 (t=1.72, df=27, p=.10), ego-orientation achievement goals and social support had a bias=0.07 (t=-.03, df=29, p=.98), and ego-orientation achievement goals and proving skills had a bias=-0.33 (t=-0.13, df=31, p=.90), all of which showed no publication bias.

Effect Size

The results of the meta-analysis of the correlation between sport achievement goal orientation variables and sport-confidence variables are shown in <Table 2>. Task-orientation achievement goals and physical/mental preparation were analyzed with a random effects model due to high heterogeneity (I2=93.1%, p<.10). The effect size was 0.48 (95% CI=0.42, 0.54), which was significant (z=13.75, p<.0001). Task-orientation achievement goals and coach leadership were highly heterogeneous (I2=90.7%, p<.10) and were analyzed in a random effects model. The effect size was 0.40 (95% CI=0.34, 0.46), with a large effect size and a significant difference (z=11.45, p<.0001). Task-orientation achievement goals and social support were highly heterogeneous (I2=90.0%, p<.10) and were analyzed in a random effects model. The effect size was 0.44 (95% CI=0.39, 0.50), with a large effect size and a significant difference (z=13.77, p<.0001). Task-orientation achievement goals and proving skills were highly heterogeneous (I2=92.5%, p<.10) and were analyzed in a random effects model. The effect size was 0.43 (95% CI=0.36, 0.48), with a large effect size and a significant difference (z=11.97, p<.0001).
Ego-orientation achievement goals and physical/mental preparation were analyzed in a random effects model due to high heterogeneity (I2=86.8%, p<.10). The effect size was 0.34 (95% CI=0.29, 0.39), which is a moderate effect size, and the difference was significant (z=13.14, p<.0001). Ego-orientation achievement goals and coach leadership were highly heterogeneous (I2=80.7%, p<.10) and were analyzed in a random effects model. The effect size was 0.38 (95% CI=0.33, 0.42), which is a moderate effect size, and the difference was significant (z=15.11, p<.0001). Ego-orientation achievement goals and social support were highly heterogeneous (I2=83.4%, p<.10) and were analyzed in a random effects model. The effect size was moderate at 0.34 (95% CI=0.29, 0.38), with a significant difference (z=13.46, p<.0001). Ego-orientation achievement goals and demonstrated competence were highly heterogeneous (I2=83.9%, p<.10) and were analyzed in a random effects model. The effect size was 0.45 (95% CI=0.41, 0.49), with a large effect size and a significant difference (z=18.69, p<.0001).

Discussion

This study conducted a meta-analysis of the Korean literature to comprehensively analyze and identify the correlation between sports achievement goal orientation and sport-confidence. A total of 34 literatures, including 22 journal articles and 12 dissertations, were selected according to the selection criteria. The meta-analysis analyzed the effect size between task-orientation achievement goals, which is a sub-variable of achievement goal orientation, and ego-orientation achievement goals, which is a sub-variable of sports self-confidence, and physical/mental preparation, coach leadership, social support, and proving skills. The results showed that all of them were positively correlated, with large effect sizes of 0.48 for task-orientation achievement goals and physical/mental preparation, 0.40 for task-orientation achievement goals and coach leadership, 0.44 for task-orientation achievement goals and social support, and 0.43 for task-orientation achievement goals and proving skills. ego-orientation achievement goals and physical/mental preparation had a moderate effect size of 0.34, ego-orientation achievement goals and coach leadership had a moderate effect size of 0.38, ego-orientation achievement goals and social support had a moderate effect size of 0.34, and ego-orientation achievement goals and proving skills had a large effect size of 0.45.
Sport achievement goal orientation is reflected in athletes’ confidence levels and successful performance in achievement situations [30], and several studies have shown that achievement goal orientation leads to differences in athletic performance behavior [21,31-33]. In particular, athletes’ latent self-confidence is an important predictor of successful achievement [34], and the more competitive an athlete is, the more likely he or she is to perform well [35]. Furthermore, achievement goal orientation theory predicts that participants who perceive skill mastery or improvement according to their own standards as the activity goal (task-orientation achievement goals) will have more positive achievement behavior and cognitive patterns (performance, self-esteem, intrinsic motivation, persistence, etc.) than participants who perceive competition and winning as the activity goal (ego-orientation achievement goals) [20,36]. To prove this hypothesis, previous studies have examined the relationship and effects of individual differences in goal orientation (tendency) or situational goal structure (motivation) on synchronized behavioral and cognitive patterns, and most findings support the achievement goal orientation theory [37,38].
In this study, sport achievement goal orientation was found to have a positive effect on sport-confidence. Achievement goal orientation has been recognized as a prerequisite for setting clear and specific goals and making personal efforts to achieve them [39,40]. Previous studies have shown that high-performing athletes have higher sport-confidence and clearer goal setting [41,42], and the results of previous studies suggest that sport achievement goal orientation is highly correlated with sport-confidence. This can be explained in the same vein as the findings that perceived competence to demonstrate one’s abilities in achievement-oriented sport situations affects self-confidence, and both task-orientation achievement goals and ego-orientation achievement goals are thought to be positively related to self-confidence because task-orientation achievement goals and ego-orientation achievement goals are both achievement-oriented [43], differing only in the sense of achievement according to standards.
Of the two, task-orientation achievement goals and ego-orientation achievement goals were found to be more correlated with sports confidence. In the case of task-orientation achievement goals, the standard of comparison is the self, so the degree of effort and improvement in competitive situations is clearly visible, and this leads to increased self-confidence, which is judged to manifest as good performance [44]. In addition, several studies have shown that task-orientation achievement goals positively affects the variables related to peak performance, which is the basis of athletes’ performance, while self-goal orientation has a negative effect [8, 45]. Therefore, it is expected that setting task-orientation achievement goals rather than ego-orientation achievement goals for peak performance will help build self-confidence, which will positively affect performance.
Among the sub-variables of sport-confidence, both task-oriented and ego-oriented achievement goals showed large effect sizes for proving skills. One of the most important implications of achievement goal orientation theory, the perception of competence according to achievement goals, is important for the development of athletes’ self-confidence in sporting situations [46]. Perceived competence, which is the desire to demonstrate one’s abilities, is a major factor in enhancing athletes’ self-confidence [22]. Therefore, achieving goals, whether they are task-oriented or self-oriented, will have a positive impact on self-confidence, which will help improve performance.
The results of this study can be used as a basis for recognizing the effectiveness and importance of dispositional goal setting in sports to increase sport-confidence which is crucial for athletes to improve their performance.

Conclusions

This study conducted a meta-analysis of the correlation between sport achievement goal orientation and sport-confidence. The conclusions are as follows. First, sport achievement goal orientation and sport-confidence are positively related. Second, among the sub-variables of sport achievement goal orientation, task-orientation achievement goals were more related to sport-confidence than ego-orientation achievement goals. Third, among the sub-variables of sport-confidence, proving skills was highly correlated with both task-oriented and ego-oriented achievement goals. The results suggest that task-oriented achievement goals are more positive for building confidence. However, since ego-orientation achievement goals were also correlated, it may be more effective to consider both task-oriented and ego-oriented achievement goals when setting goals to improve sports confidence.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Figure 1.
Flowchart outlining article selection process.
ajk-2024-26-3-10f1.jpg
Table 1.
Characteristics of Studies.
Authors Year Publication Type Participants (N) Number of Correlated Variables Analyzed
Ahn 2016 dissertation sepaktakraw players (545) 8
Bae & Jeong 2011 journal article applicants of kinesiology department (406) 8
Choi 2021 dissertation taekwondo demonstration team members in universities (333) 8
Choi 2017 dissertation university taekwondo players (284) 8
Chun 2020 dissertation fitness center members (479) 6
Chun & Hwang 2019 journal article general sport class participants (293) 6
Chun & Yun 2016 journal article middle school judo athletes (265) 6
Ha 2023 journal article college elite athletes (347) 8
Han & Hong 2013 journal article dance sports club member (290) 4
Han & Yang 2013 journal article middle and high school soccer plays (469) 6
Hong 2020 dissertation physical education college entrance preparation academy’s students (300) 8
Jung & Lee 2019 journal article middle and high school sports club participants (314) 8
Jung & Cho 2019 journal article high school & college badminton players (209) 8
Jung et al. 2015 journal article middle, high school, college and companies inline skating players (239) 6
Kang 2017 journal article yacht academy participants (374) 6
Kang 2013 dissertation high school taekwondo athletes (271) 8
Kang 2017 dissertation male basketball players in second division of a university (127) 8
Kim 2011 dissertation middle, high school, university and business shooting team (320) 8
Kim 2021 dissertation university taekwondo athletes (321) 8
Kim & Cho 2017 journal article martial arts athletes in university (228) 8
Kim & Park 2018 journal article dance sports athletes in university (204) 8
Kim & Yoon 2022 journal article interest in badminton participants (214) 8
Kim et al. 2017 journal article university taekwondo players (297) 8
Kim et al. 2021 journal article middle and high school taekwondo plays (465) 6
Lee 2015 journal article youth and junior badminton national team players (84) 6
Lee 2019 dissertation sports billiard players (223) 8
Lee 2021 dissertation high school, college and business team wrestlers (280) 8
Lee & Kim 2022 journal article high school athletes in team sports 8
Lee & Oh 2012 journal article high school bowling players (203) 8
Lim & Oh 2022 journal article fitness center coaches (275) 6
Oh 2010 journal article female athletes in college athletic team (351) 8
Seol et al. 2013 journal article middle and high school taekwondo players (209) 6
Seong 2017 dissertation elementary school judo athletes (247) 6
Yoon 2018 journal article female professional golfers (127) 8
Table 2.
Effect size of correlation coefficient between TEOSQ variables and SSCQ variables.
TEOSQ SSCQ K I2 Q (df) p Model Z [95% CI]
task-orientation achievement goals physical/mental preparation 30 93.1 419.05(28) <.0001 random 0.48[0.42-0.54]
task-orientation achievement goals coach leadership 29 90.7 301.62(28) <.0001 random 0.40[0.34-0.46]
task-orientation achievement goals social support 31 92.0 374.33(30) <.0001 random 0.44[0.39-0.50]
task-orientation achievement goals proving skills 33 92.5 426.61(32) <.0001 random 0.43[0.36-0.48]
ego-orientation achievement goals physical/mental preparation 30 86.8 219.39(29) <.0001 random 0.34[0.29-0.39]
ego-orientation achievement goals coach leadership 29 80.7 144.86(28) <.0001 random 0.38[0.33-0.42]
ego-orientation achievement goals social support 31 83.4 180.23(30) <.0001 random 0.34[0.29-0.38]
ego-orientation achievement goals proving skills 33 83.9 198.26(32) <.0001 random 0.45[0.41-0.49]

K=the number of effect sizes; I2=inconsistency index; Q=cochran’s Q; df=degree of freedom; p<.05; Z=effect sizes; CI=confidence interval

References

1. Weinberg RS, Gould D. Foundations of sport and exercise psychology. Hum Kinet; 2023.

2. Ames C. Achievement attributions and self-instructions under competitive and individualistic goal structures. J Educ Psychol. 1984; 76(3): 478–87.
crossref
3. Park MW. Influence of Taekwondo instructor’s style of leadership upon the players’ achievement goal orientation and self-actualization [Doctoral dissertation] Dong-A University, Busan, Republic of Korea. 2007.

4. Nicholls JG. Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychol Rev. 1984; 91(3): 328–46.
crossref
5. Duda JL, Newton M. Psychometric characteristics of the TEOSQ. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the North American Society for the Psychology of Sport & Physical Activity, University Houston, TX. 1990.

6. Duda JL. Goals: A social-cognitive approach to the study of achievement motivation in sport. In R. N. Singer (Ed.), Handbook of research on sport psychology. New York: MacMillan. 1993, p 421-436.

7. Han KH, Kim YW. Meta-analysis of the Relationship between Athletes’ Achievement Goal Orientation and Self-management. J Sport Leis Stud. 2018; 73:331–40.
crossref
8. Whitehead J, Duda J. Measurement of goal perspectives in the physical domain. In Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement. Fitness Information Technology; 1998; p.21–48.

9. Elliot AJ, McGregor HA. Test anxiety and the hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999; 76(4): 628–44.
crossref pmid
10. Hollenbeck GP, Hall DT. Self-confidence and leader performance. Organizational Dynamics. 2004; 33(3): 254–69.
crossref
11. Ko HS, Chun BK. The Effects of College athlete’ Self-management to Sport Confidence and Perceived Performance. Korean J Sport Sci. 2014; 23(1): 547–61.

12. Vealey RS. Conceptualization of sport-confidence and competitive orientation: Preliminary investigation and instrument development. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 1986; 8(3): 221–46.
crossref
13. Kim WB. Verification on the Validity of Sources of Sport - Confidence Questionnaire. Korean Soc Sport Psychol. 1999; 10(2): 107–22.

14. Kim HK, Yoon SY. The Moderating Effects of Self-Management in the Relationship between Badminton Participants’ Achievement Goal Orientation and their Sport Confidence. J Sport Leis Stud. 2022; 90:267–77.
crossref
15. Hall HK, Kerr AW. Motivational antecedents of precompetitive anxiety in youth sport. Sport Psychol. 1997; 11(1): 24–42.
crossref
16. Mills BD. Trait sport confidence, goal orientation and competitive experience of female collegiate volleyball players. Percept Mot skills. 1996; 82(3_suppl): 1085–6.
crossref pdf
17. Hwang SD. Meta analysis. Seoul: Hakjisa; 2014.

18. Jackson GB. Methods for integrative reviews. Rev Educ Res. 1980; 50(3): 438–60.
crossref
19. Halsey LG, Curran-Everett D, Vowler SL, Drummond GB. The fickle P value generates irreproducible results. Nat Methods. 2015; 12(3): 179–85.
crossref pmid pdf
20. Duda J. Sport and exercise motivation: A goal perspective analysis. In Motivation in sport and exercise. Hum Kinet; 1992; p.57–91.

21. Nicholls JG. The competitive ethos and democratic education. Harvard University Press; 1989.

22. Vealey RS, Garner-Holman M, Hayashi SW, Giacobbi P. Sources of sport-confidence: Conceptualization and instrument development. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 1998; 20(1): 54–80.
crossref
23. Schmitt NW, Klimoski RJ, Ferris GR, Rowland KM. Research methods in human resources management. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Pub; 1991.

24. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein HR. Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons; 2021.

25. Oh SS. Meta-analysis: theory and practice. Seoul: Konkuk University Press; 2002.

26. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge; 2013.

27. Mussweiler T, Corcoran K, Crusius J. Social comparison: Motives, standards, and mechanisms. Theories in Social Psychology. 2011; p 119-139.

28. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.4 (updated September 2023). 2023.

29. Egger M, Smith GD, Phillips AN. Meta-analysis: principles and procedures. Brit Med J. 1997; 315(7121): 1533–7.
crossref pmid pmc
30. Robert GC. Understanding the Dynamics of achievement goals, personal agency beliefs, and the motivational climate. In G. C. Roberts (ED.), Advances in motivation in sport and exercise (1-50). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. 2001.

31. Dweck CS. Motivational processes affecting learning. Am Psychol. 1986; 41(10): 1040–8.
crossref
32. Kim YK, Kim DJ, Cho SH. The Effect of Squash player’s Achievement Goal Orientation and Competitive Anxiety on Performance Self-Confidence. J Coaching Dev. 2005; 7(3): 291–300.

33. Kim YT, Hong SH. The Relationships Among Achievement Goal Orientation, Competitive State Anxiety, Self-efficacy and Performance Outcome in the Golfers. J Sport Leis Stud. 2004; 22:379–90.
crossref
34. Kim BS, Kim YK. The Relationship Between Teenager Athletes`s Perceptional Sport Confidence and Inner Motivation. J Sport Leis Stud. 2009; 35:587–96.
crossref
35. Jung EH, Cho YG. The Effects of Badminton Players’ Achievement Goal Orientation on Sports Confidence. The Korean J Sport. 2019; 17(1): 755–67.

36. Duda JL. Motivation in sport settings: A goal perspective approach. In G. C. Roberts (Ed.), Motivation in sport and exercise. Human Kinetics Books. 1995, p 57-91.

37. Duda JL, Chi L, Newton ML, Walling MD, et al. Task and ego orientation and intrinsic motivation in sport. Int J Sport Psychol. 1995; 26(1): 40–63.

38. Han TJ. The Relationship among Amateur Wrestlers’ Achievement Goal Orientation, Self-management and Sport Self-confidence. Korean Soc Sport Psychol. 2008; 19(4): 35–52.

39. Brawley LR, Carron AV, Widmeyer WN. The nature of group goals in sport teams: A phenomenological analysis. The Sport Psychol. 1992; 6(4): 323–33.
crossref
40. Cohn PJ, Rotella RJ, Lloyd JW. Effects of a cognitive-behavioral intervention on the preshot routine and performance in golf. Sport Psychol. 1990; 4(1): 33–47.
crossref
41. Park CH, Lee YK, Cho MS, Jeong HT. The Effect of Achievement Goals and Sport confidence of Athletes on Leadership Style of Judo Coach’s. The Korean J Sport. 2016; 11(2): 55–68.

42. Smith D, Wright C, Allsopp A, Westhead H. It’s all in the mind: PETTLEP-based imagery and sports performance. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2007; 19(1): 80–92.
crossref
43. Elliot AJ, Harackiewicz JM. Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996; 70(3): 461–75.
crossref
44. Choi HJ. Effects of Achievement Goal Orientation on Internal Motivation and Sport Self-Confidence of University Taekwondo Athletes. [Master’s dissertation] Pukyong National University, Busan, Republic of Korea. 2017.

45. Duda JL, Nicholls JG. Dimensions of achievement motivation in schoolwork and sport. J Educ Psychol. 1992; 84(3): 290–9.
crossref
46. Heper E, Yolacan S, Kocaeksi S. The examine goal orientation and sports self confidence level of soccer players. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci. 2014; 159:197–200.
crossref
TOOLS
Share :
Facebook Twitter Linked In Google+ Line it
METRICS Graph View
  • 0 Crossref
  •    
  • 722 View
  • 31 Download
Related articles in AJK


ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

AUTHOR INFORMATION
Editorial Office
The Office of 10th Gangnam Sangga, 303, Hyoryong-ro, Seochogu, Seoul, Korea (06643)
Tel: +82-10-4044-3814    E-mail: ajk.editor@gmail.com                

Copyright © 2024 by The Asian Society of Kinesiology and the Korean Academy of Kinesiology.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next